The study was conducted by Cem Işık & Sümeyra Yılmaz from Springer
Science under Education Info Business Media Publication in 2011. The research was motivated by some research
questions related to CALL listening instruction. It was intended to show
whether or not computer assisted listening instruction had an effect on the
listening comprehension proficiency of learners. The goal was to investigate
how beneficial CALL could be for a second language learner and whether or not a
learner would show any improvement in performance. In addition, another
aim of this study was to evaluate the students’ attitudes towards computer-assisted learning.
Participants in the study
were placed in two groups an experimental and a control group. None of the
groups received any listening instruction outside of the study during the
experimental period. After the pre-test, the experimental group studied in a
language laboratory with computers and the control group took classes in a
traditional classroom with tape recorder. The experiment lasted 4 weeks in
which ten units of listening activities were given to both groups, using the
same content materials in the two different formats.
At the beginning of the
study, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of
their performance in the first unit scores. However, a significant difference
emerged between the experimental and control group in the rest of the units.
The experimental group showed significantly greater progress during the
treatment after the first unit. Statistical analysis of the post-test showed
that the 24 hours of computer assisted study had a positive effect on the
experimental group’s achievement in the
post-test. Cem Işık & Sümeyra Yılmaz are both agree that computer
assisted instruction did create an effect on listening skills of students when
compared with the control group which received traditional classroom listening
instruction. When computers are used in language instruction, the learning pace
is faster. They concluded that the
computer assisted listening instruction affected the experimental group’s learning pace greatly in a positive
manner compared with traditional listening instruction.
The research also looked at
the comparative results between genders and there was no significant difference
between females and males in the pre-test. However, when the researchers compared
females in control group with males in experimental group in terms of their post-test
results, they saw that there was no significant difference between both genders
but females in the control group were more successful. On the other hand,
females in the experimental group were more successful than males in control
group and a significant difference was seen between them.
The conclusion that the researchers had found is that computer assisted instruction did create a quantifiable important effect on listening skills of students when compared with the control group which received traditional classroom listening instruction. When computers are used in language instruction, the learning pace is faster. In this study, Cem Işık & Sümeyra Yılmaz concluded that the computer assisted listening instruction affected the experimental group’s learning pace greatly in a positive manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment